Lesson: 41

Topic: Statements, Confessions, and Interrogation

Objective:

During this lesson students will explore a number of issues related to statements, confessions, and interrogation. As such, students will come to appreciate the applicable case and statute law regarding:

In particular, students will come to understand the protection offered by the "Confessions Rule" in Canada, as well as the Charter rights offered under sections 

Method of Instruction and Evaluation:

for learning After a Socratic lecture on statements, confessions, and the protection offered to citizens under both the Charter and the "Confessions Rule," students will form into four groups in order to examine the case of R. v. Oickle, 2000 (SCC). The groups will each examine a particular aspect of case law relating to the admissibility of confessions under the "Confessions Rule," namely: threats or promises, oppression, operating mind, and police trickery.

 

Group Issue Reference  (R. v. Oickle)
1 Threats or promises  (paras. 48-57)
2 Oppression (paras. 58-62)
3 Operating mind (paras. 63-64)
4 Police trickery  (paras. 65-67) 

After familiarizing themselves with their respective elements of the "Confessions" rule, the groups will demonstrate these elements within a brief dramatic presentation.

Expectations Addressed:

The "Criminal Law and Procedures" strand of the CLN4U Ministry of Education Curriculum Guidelines outlines all of the following specific expectations. The specific expectations addressed by this lesson have been highlighted below.

Resources:


Return to main index