Lesson: 30

Topic: Rights Upon Arrest

Objectives:

During this lesson, students will examine modern procedures and conditions of investigation, arrest, and detention. In particular, students will come to understand the limits on the state's powers during arrest, and the rights provided to the accused.

Miranda Warning: (Informal  term in Canada) Based on the US landmark case, Miranda v. Arizona, 1966. In this case the suspect, Ernesto Miranda, was not informed of his constitutional right to remain silent before he confessed to rape. The charge was dropped by the US Supreme Court. Following the Miranda decision, American police were required to inform arrested persons of their rights under the ruling, termed a “Miranda warning.”

In addition, students will analyze the following steps of our present-day Canadian arrest procedures:

Method of Instruction and Evaluation:

In groups, students will examine a mock scenario of a crime and an arrest. Students will then answer the following questions about the incident:

  1. What offence, if any, has been committed?
  2. If the perpetrator did not get any money, has an offence been committed?
  3. If you determine an offence has been committed in either 1. or 2. above, what type of offence is this? Quote the section.
  4. Can Ara arrest the perpetrator?

Once the groups have answered these questions, they will share their conclusions with the class. The class will then examine the appropriate sections of the Criminal Code to seek clarification on the above questions.

Expectations Addressed:

The "Criminal Law and Procedures" strand of the CLN4U Ministry of Education Curriculum Guidelines outlines all of the following specific expectations. By the end of this class, the student will be able to address those specific expectations that have been highlighted below.

Resources:



Return to main index