Lesson: 63
Topic: The Ontario Human Rights Code - Case Studies
Objectives:
During this class students will examine the Ontario Human Rights Code and the Ontario Human Rights Commission.
Established in 1962, the Ontario Human Rights Commission is committed to the elimination of discrimination in society by providing the people of Ontario with strong leadership and quality service in:
To assist students in exploring the issues outlined above, the class will form into three groups in order to examine case studies involving actual human rights complaints within Ontario.
| Group A | Jeppesen v. Corporation of the Town of Ancaster, Fire and Emergency Services et al. |
| Group B | Metsala v. Falconbridge Ltd, Kidd Creek Division |
| Group C | Fuller v. Daoud and Desquilbet |
After each group examines their respective case, students will answer the following questions associated with their specific case:
Students will then share the facts of the case, as well as their conclusions, with the class.
Expectations Addressed:
The "Rights and Freedoms" strand of the CLN4U Ministry of Education Curriculum Guidelines outlines all of the following specific expectations. The specific expectations addressed by this lesson have been highlighted below.
Human Rights in Canada:
explain the evolution of Canadian human rights legislation from English common law to the Canadian Bill of Rights and then the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms;
evaluate the protections provided by federal and provincial human rights legislation (e.g., Canadian Human Rights Act, Ontario Human Rights Code);
identify historical and contemporary barriers to the equal enjoyment of human rights faced by individuals and groups in Canada, and analyse their effects.
Canadian Constitutional Law:
distinguish between the law-making powers of the federal, provincial, and municipal governments;
explain what a constitution is and why it is necessary;
explain the role of the courts in determining law-making jurisdiction;
explain the significance of key events in Canadian constitutional history (e.g., the British North America Act, 1867; the Statute of Westminster, 1931; the Constitution Act, 1982; the Meech Lake Accord, 1987; the Charlottetown Accord, 1992).
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms:
explain what is meant by entrenching rights in a written constitution;
analyse how rights and freedoms are protected under the Charter of Rights and Freedoms (e.g., fundamental freedoms; democratic, mobility, legal, equality, and language rights);
explain how rights included in the Charter are accompanied by corresponding responsibilities or obligations;
explain how citizens can exercise their rights under the Charter (e.g., by initiating Charter challenges in the courts to legislation or government action; by raising the Charter as a defence when charged with an offence).
The Legislature and the Judiciary:
explain how rights may be limited or overruled according to the Charter (e.g., section 1, section 33);
evaluate the role of the courts and tribunals and, in particular, the Supreme Court of Canada, in interpreting Charter rights;
describe how Charter rights are enforced.
Minority and Majority Rights:
identify historical and contemporary examples of conflicts between minority and majority rights (e.g., Riel Rebellion, the Quebec sovereignty debate, First Nation land claims);
explain why it is difficult but essential to balance majority and minority rights in a democracy;
evaluate the political and legal avenues available for resolving conflicts (e.g., the courts, tribunals, legislation, referendums).
Resources:
Relevant web sites: